As some may know on July 1, I will begin my new assignment as Dean of the College of Social Sciences, Mathematics & Education at the University of Tampa. UT is a private university with an enrollment of 7,000 students located in downtown Tampa, Florida.
It's a big change for The Rural Guy. In fact, it's so big that I feel compelled to terminate the blog, as it seems a bit hypocritical to write a blog as The Rural Guy from the middle of a metropolitan area. So to avoid the dissonance, this will be my last post.
I will greatly miss the sights, sounds and smells of rural Minnesota. Many have already told me that I will most certainly return in a few years. Maybe so; who knows? But I can say without hesitation that rural Minnesota has been a great place for me, my kids, my family and my career.
Until we meet again somewhere in rural Minnesota or along Florida's Gulf Coast; so long.
Monday, June 17, 2013
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Minnesota is Falling Behind on Broadband
In 2008 former Governor Tim
Pawlenty created the first Governor’s Broadband Task Force to assess the status
of broadband deployment, adoption and utilization in Minnesota and set goals
for future access and connection speeds.
Understanding that broadband technology was going to be a key driver in
business recruitment and retention, retail and commerce, distance education,
tele-medicine and the delivery of efficient public services, the 2010 Minnesota
State Legislature took those task force goals and enacted legislation setting
them into statute. As stated in statute,
“as soon as possible, but no later than
2015, all state residents and businesses have access to high-speed broadband
that provides minimum download speeds of 10 to 20 megabits per second and
minimum upload speeds of 5 to 10 megabits per second.” Further, the statute goes on to state “… that by 2015 and thereafter, Minnesota be in
the top five states of the United States for broadband speed universally
accessible to residents and businesses; the top five states for broadband
access; and the top 15 when compared to countries globally for broadband
penetration.” (Minnesota Statutes; Chapter
237.012).
Since those goals were first
established there have been two subsequent broadband task forces with the
latest iteration established in 2011 by Governor Dayton. That task force released its 2012 annual
report and broadband plan in December, with a number of recommendations to help
improve access to broadband; and for some, improve its affordability. However as
a member of the original broadband task force, the real message sent to the
Governor in this report is that Minnesota is continuing to fall further behind
in both access and speed. Citing Task Force chair Margaret Anderson Kelliher,
“While the Task Force is encouraged to report that progress is being made
toward the state’s broadband goal, we are not on track to meet them by
2015.”
With all deference to Chairperson
Kelliher in her letter to the Governor, she is being too polite and kind with
her words. The reality is that Minnesota
is falling further behind as it relates to broadband access and speed with each
passing year. As noted in the report
only 61.6 percent of Minnesota households have access to the state-mandated
speeds (a minimum of 10 Mbps down and 5 Mbps up), which leaves over 800,000
Minnesota households behind; and not surprisingly, most of those left behind
are in rural Minnesota. As documented in
a detailed chart, the report goes on to show that while 98 percent of
households in Hennepin County and 99 percent in Ramsey county meet the
state-mandated connection speeds, zero percent of households in Roseau, Lake of the
Woods, Cook, Mahnomen, Aitkin, Kanebec, Mille Lacs or Wadena counties reach
this state-mandated threshold.
Information from outside
sources paint an even more troubling picture. According to the Akamai 2012 “State
of the Internet” report, when compared with other states on average connection
speeds, Minnesota has now fallen to 25th in its state ranking and is
threatened with being in the lower half of all states. Further, as it relates
to broadband access, according to data from the National Broadband Map (a joint
project of the National Telecommunications Information Administration and the
Federal Communications Commission), Minnesota has actually slipped to 38th
in ranking; down from 28th a year earlier.
It’s important to recognize
that in spite of this troubling news Minnesotans continue to embrace the
Internet and broadband technology.
Today, three out of every four Minnesota households report purchasing a
home broadband connection. Additionally,
if we were to include the adoption of mobile Internet technology through smart
phones and tablets, it would likely be closer to four out of every five. So understand that consumers are doing their
part. In fact today the largest group of
Minnesotans who choose not to embrace the Internet are elderly Minnesotans,
defined as those 65 years of age or older.
But even that cohort is witnessing sizable gains in their adoption of
Internet and broadband technology. And
remember … every day another 64-year old with digital skills has a birthday and
joins this cohort, increasing the adoption rate as a result. So let’s not blame the consumer.
Rather, if there is blame to
be assigned, I would have to point to our legislature. Simply passing statutes that set broadband
goals is no more effective than passing a U.N. resolution! It may make you feel good, but it is of
little consequence. Like other states
that were once behind Minnesota in the rankings but now are ahead of us, we
need policymakers who are willing to set strategies in addition to goals; and
equally important, to appropriate funds to help implement such strategies. The Governor’s Broadband Task Force did their
job in helping the Governor and the Legislature understand that we are at a critical
juncture in our state’s broadband trajectory.
Further, the Task Force outlines a series of recommendations to
establish public/private partnerships that could help meet the goal of
ubiquitous broadband across Minnesota.
Now we will have to wait and see what the legislature chooses to do with
it.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Time for a New Conversation on Taxes
Now that both the November elections and the November budget
forecast is behind us, the political dynamics associated with the 2013
legislative session is much clearer. The
evaporation of GOP influence across all levels of state governance was
admittedly a bit surprising. However,
what was not surprising was the rhetoric from both parties regarding their
reaction to the November economic forecast projecting an upcoming biennial budget
deficit of $1.1 billion. While
representatives of both parties were quick to agree that such a deficit was
much more manageable than the $5+ billion deficit faced 2 years ago, their respective
solutions were predictably routine. Almost
immediately after the forecast was released Republican voices were emphasizing
that the current biennial balance of approximately $1 billion was a “surplus”
and that there was no need for any tax increases. Equally predictable was DFL Governor Dayton’s
call for higher income tax rates on Minnesota’s top earners; a call he has made
since his 2010 election.
To say that we need a new conversation about taxes in this
state is obvious. How else can you
explain such rhetoric? First, suggesting
that Minnesota has a budget surplus is like your brother-in-law telling you that
he received a $500 raise and therefore has more money to spend, all the while
ignoring the fact that he still owes $20,000 on his credit card. Similarly, calling for higher income taxes on
the rich (or anybody) simply exacerbates Minnesota’s already disproportionate
dependence on the income tax. So before
both parties stake their ground on these all too-familiar positions, can’t we
try to change the conversation?
One idea that has been around for quite a while, but seldom
seriously addressed is the notion of broadening the sales tax base. The arguments for changing the conversation
in this direction are two-fold; and from my perspective compelling. The first is that since the establishment of the
sales tax in 1967, our Minnesota economy has fundamentally shifted from one
that produces “goods” to one that delivers “services.” However, the current sales tax is primarily imposed
on the purchase of goods and not the delivery of services. This means that each year as our economy continues
to transform, the sales tax becomes less relevant and effective.
Such deliberate policy decisions to exclude certain goods or
services from the collection of sales tax is often called a “tax expenditure,”
and Minnesota has plenty of them. But
the decision to exclude many consumer and business services is a big one. According to a study by the Public Strategies
Group in 2009, the inclusion of many consumer and business services currently
exempt from the sales tax could yield up to $2 billion in additional revenue
per year. In light of the fact that the
projected biennial budget deficit is $1.1 billion, isn’t such a change in
conversation worthwhile?
The
second reason for looking more closely at these tax expenditures is that while
the appropriated general fund budget must be debated and approved line-by-line
by legislators and signed by the Governor every biennium, once a tax
expenditure is approved by the legislature it remains in place until the
legislature intentionally modifies or repeals it. In simple terms, this means that after being
passed a tax expenditure go on “auto-pilot” and remains in place for
decades without any legislative discussion or review. Is this really the best way to legislate tax
policy?
Of
course the high profile “poster child” for such sales tax exemptions is the one
on clothing; an exemption that many suggest is woven into the cultural fabric
of Minnesotans. But the truth is that there are many sales tax exemptions that no
one would ever want to change; such as the sales tax exemption on prescription
drugs, groceries, and yes … clothing.
But just because we can agree on a variety of such exemptions is not a
rationale for ignoring a thorough review of the more than 200 such tax
expenditures currently in statute (yes … over 200!). For example, do we really still need a sales
tax exemption on newspapers and magazines ($65 million); an exemption on
telecommunications equipment ($26 million); or an exemption on farm machinery
($36 million)?
My
point here is not to specifically pick on these exemptions, but rather to point
out that collectively these special tax breaks add up to more than $11 billion in
revenues not collected (Public Strategies Group, 2009). And as noted
above, once enacted these tax exemptions tend to go on auto-pilot. Could a thorough review of all these tax
expenditures by the Legislative Auditor lead to the elimination of at least one
out of every ten of these exemptions?
Now that would totally change the conversation!
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
An Innovative Collaboration
I entered the Minneapolis Convention Center with a mixture
of curiosity and excitement. The
occasion was the 2012 Tekne Awards; the Minnesota High Tech Association’s
version of the Academy Awards for technology entrepreneurs and innovators. And as I entered the Convention Center I was handed
a badge and steered toward a reception area upstairs designated for the award
finalists. In the ballroom below were
approximately 1,000 guests in a festive mood from all across Minnesota’s high
tech industry. I knew this was going to
be a fun evening.
As I climbed the stairs to reach the reception area I
noticed everyone shared the same badge as me with the word “Finalist” on
it. Slowly as my eyes focused I began to
see friends and colleagues I have either known or have gotten to know over the
past two years. For you see, in 2010 the
Blandin Foundation was awarded a multi-million dollar grant from the National
Telecommunications Information Administration to coordinate a large, statewide
initiative designed to promote broadband adoption all across rural
Minnesota. Known as the Minnesota
Intelligent Rural Community (MIRC) project, this unique initiative brought
together more than 20 different organizations, institutions, agencies and rural
communities to focus their efforts on increasing broadband adoption among Minnesota’s
rural residents, as well as rural businesses. And it was this initiative,
spearheaded by the Blandin Foundation that was a finalist for the 2012 Tekne
Award in the category of “Innovative Collaboration.” As a broadband researcher for many years the
Blandin Foundation tapped me back in 2010 to serve as the project’s evaluator
over the next two years. In other words it was my job to document all the
activity by this large group of partners all across the state and at the end of
the 2-year effort to examine the impact and consequences of their work.
To state that the scope of the project was comprehensive is
an understatement, as the project strategically targeted key groups of
non-adopters. For those low-income rural
residents who couldn’t afford a computer, our partner PC’s of People secured,
refurbished and distributed over 2,000 computers to needy rural families. The average annual household income among
those receiving these computers was $12,145, with over 35 percent having an
unemployed head of household. After all,
for many Minnesota businesses today you can’t even apply for a job without
being able to submit your application online. And if you are thinking, about
the unmet computer literacy and training needs of many rural residents, our
partners at DEED, U of M Extension, MnSCU and the Minnesota Renewable Energy
Marketplace delivered more than 31,000 hours of training and technical
assistance, both online and across rural Minnesota.
More than 2,000 rural businesses were provided training;
over 6,000 rural businesses were reached; and direct technical assistance was
provided to more than 60 small rural businesses by our partner at the U of M
Extension. Over the two years U of M
Extension not only provided this important technical assistance, but with more
than 60 percent of all major purchases beginning with a web-search today, they
helped rural businesses understand the importance of managing their “digital
tele-presence” in today’s economy. This was all bolstered by the efforts of the
nine rural Regional Development Commissions providing outreach and media
information all across their respective rural regions. As I noted, this was a remarkable coordinated
effort with a broad scope across an even broader geography we call Greater
Minnesota.
And what was the consequence of all of this time and effort?
Well beginning with over 4,000 baseline surveys conducted back in 2010, we have
tracked the growth in broadband subscriptions from quarter-to-quarter,
regularly reporting our progress to the National Telecommunications Information
Administration. With a goal
of achieving 38,000 new broadband subscriptions across rural Minnesota within
the 2-year period, the current count now stands at 40,496.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Taking the Temperature of Rural Main Street
In
today’s environment, any discussion of economic development inevitably includes
the concept of entrepreneurship and small business development; and such
discussions are particularly relevant when assessing rural communities. The relative health of the businesses on Main
Street has been a big concern in many rural communities for decades and trying
to take the temperature of these businesses is not that easy. Using somewhat crude measures it’s easy to
count the number of empty storefronts or closed businesses; but such measures
are really not very helpful. However,
tracking sales tax receipts is actually a more useful measure that is fairly
accurate, easy to understand, and the data is collected for you by the Minnesota
Department of Revenue.
So
I was pleased to see a recent study published by Will Craig and Bruce Schwartau
from the University of Minnesota that did just that. If the names of Craig and Schwartau seem
familiar it’s because I previously mentioned their work a few months ago. In that earlier study they examined the sales
tax revenues of the largest communities outside the Twin Cities metro
(Rochester, Duluth, St. Cloud and Mankato) and highlighted the explosive growth
and development of Mankato as a regional center. However, in this new study they examine data
released by the Minnesota Department of Revenue for much smaller communities;
many as small as 1,000 in population.
Accordingly, data for communities of this size really can help us take
the economic temperature of rural Main Street.
Another
interesting fact relative to this new study is that it examines sales tax data
from 2003-2009. If you recall, this was
not exactly the best years for the Minnesota economy. In fact, state government experienced a significant
contraction in 2003 and a subsequent partial government shutdown in 2005. This
was then followed by two reasonable years of economic growth before both the
financial and housing sectors crashed in late 2007, leading to the “Great
Recession,” which presumably ended in 2009.
In fact according to Craig and Schwartau, between 2003 and 2009 sales
tax receipts statewide were down 14 percent, after adjusting for inflation and
the 2008 state sales tax increase. With
this in mind you can guess that my expectations for how our rural Main Streets
might fare during this same period of time were quite subdued.
So
you can imagine my surprise when the data indicated that many of our rural
communities actually fared quite well and in fact some even thrived. What is most interesting to note is that
among the largest out-state communities (mean population 89,089) the average
change in sales tax revenue was -15.7%, with only 25 percent of these
communities recording an increase in sales tax collections. However, among the smallest communities in
the group (mean population 2,502) the average change was a loss half that size
(-7.1%), but more importantly 54 percent of these small communities actually recorded
an increase in sales tax revenue between 2003 and 2009.
How
can one explain or make sense out of this data?
Well looking a bit more closely at this data reveals a very interesting correlation. While the size of the community clearly is a
factor in determining the amount of sales tax revenue collected, the geographic
proximity of alternative shopping venues appears to be equally important. Allow me to provide a simple example. Aiken, Minnesota is a community of 2,165
residents that is situated approximately 31 miles northeast of Brainerd and 54
miles to the south of Grand Rapids. Given
the inconvenience to alternative shopping for their routine needs, businesses
in Aitkin collected $2.54 million in sales tax revenue in 2009. Now let’s look Janesville, MN; a community of
similar size (population 2,256) but one that is conveniently located 17 miles
on a four-lane highway east of Mankato, MN.
In 2009 with approximately 100 additional residents, Janesville’s
businesses collected only $370,000 in sales tax receipts; approximately
one-sixth of that collected in Aitkin.
So
what do we make of this new analysis by Craig and Schwartau. Well clearly the good news to be gleaned is
that with 54 percent of these small rural communities recording an increase in
sales tax revenues between 2003 and 2009, it suggests that many of these small
towns are still both relevant and resilient even in difficult times. Second, similar to the slogan used regarding
the attributes of real estate, location and proximity to alternative shopping
venues plays an important role in determining the overall health of our rural
Main Streets. Sometimes a bit of distance is a good thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)